Federal Judge Who Blocked ICE Arrests May Have Conflict Of Interest: Report

According to a new report by independent journalist Laura Loomer, the husband of U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston—recently appointed by President Biden—may have a financial interest that raises concerns about a potential conflict of interest in a recent immigration-related ruling. Judge Thurston issued a preliminary injunction on April 29, 2025, barring federal immigration agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants without individual arrest warrants across parts of California, including Kern County.

Loomer reports that Judge Thurston’s husband, Marc A. Thurston, is a senior vice president at ASU Commercial and works as a multifamily real estate broker in Bakersfield, California. According to Loomer, Marc Thurston has publicly expressed concerns that mass deportation policies, such as those promoted by former President Donald Trump, could negatively affect the local rental market, particularly in communities with large undocumented populations.

In videos reportedly posted to his Instagram account and later deleted, Marc Thurston allegedly stated that widespread deportations would lead to high vacancy rates, impacting landlords and investors in the Bakersfield area. Loomer argues that this connection should have prompted Judge Thurston to recuse herself from the case due to the appearance of a conflict of interest.

She cites federal judicial guidelines requiring recusal in instances where a judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned (28 U.S.C. § 455(a)), or if their spouse has a financial interest that could be substantially affected by the case’s outcome (28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4)).

Judge Thurston’s injunction limits U.S. Border Patrol agents’ authority in her district, requiring them to obtain warrants before making arrests unless there is reason to believe a suspect may flee. Her ruling also stipulates that agents must have reasonable suspicion before stopping individuals and prohibits pressuring them into “voluntary departure” without proper advisement of their rights.

The ruling follows the ACLU’s legal challenge to a January immigration enforcement effort, “Operation Return to Sender,” during which numerous individuals—primarily farmworkers and day laborers—were allegedly detained without due process. Newsweek notes that Thurston’s order applies only to federal agents operating within her judicial district.

Related Posts

These are the signs that you are cr…See more

Lip Cancer Tongue Cancer Inner Cheek Cancer Gum Cancer Cancer of the lower part of the mouth You should see your dentist as soon as you see…

10 True Stories That Prove Life Can Begin Right After It Feels Like It’s Over

Ten Times Life Fell Apart—And Led to Something Better Just when it seems the floor has given way, a hidden door can open. These true accounts show…

The Meaning of the Three-Dot Tattoo

Exploring the World of Russian Prison Tattoos: The Three-Dot Symbol Have you ever wondered about the deep symbolism behind Russian prison tattoos? One of the most fascinating…

THE NIGHT I WALKED AWAY AND EVERYTHING CHANGED

I used to fix my boss’s reports after hours without a word. Then he mocked me in front of the team and banned overtime. So that night,…

6 Stories That Show Parents Are Basically Superheroes in Disguise

Moms and dads always do surprising things every day, often without anyone catching. They help, caring for, and encourage us in ways that can feel almost fascinating….

My Nephew Took My Car Without Asking and Crashed It — My Brother Refused to Pay but Karma Handled It

My Nephew Crashed My Car and My Family Covered It Up — But Karma Handed Me the Perfect Trap In my family, silence is golden — especially…