Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Biden Admin Coal Waste Rule

The Supreme Court has refused to block a Biden administration rule aimed at preventing legacy toxic waste from closed coal plants from seeping into and contaminating nearby groundwater.

In a brief order, the court denied an emergency request from the East Kentucky Power Cooperative to temporarily halt the rule while ongoing litigation challenging it is resolved, The Hill reported.

 

The Supreme Court did not provide an explanation for its decision to reject the power cooperative’s petition, and no dissents were noted, the outlet said.

The ruling does not necessarily indicate that the justices believe the rule is lawful; it simply means they are not prepared to block it before lower courts have ruled on the challenges.

The rule in question targets “coal ash,” a byproduct of coal plants containing hazardous substances such as mercury and arsenic. It mandates that coal plants closed before October 19, 2015, take measures to prevent coal ash from leaking out of storage ponds.

 

The East Kentucky co-op asked the court to halt the rule, arguing that it would suffer from “unrecoverable compliance costs” if it did not.

Earlier this week, the nation’s highest court passed up an opportunity to correct a ruling by Hawaii’s Supreme Court that appears to violate Second Amendment interpretations.

In a February ruling, the Hawaii court openly rejected landmark Second Amendment cases that have been decided by the highest court in the country, finding the “spirit of Aloha clashes with a federally mandated lifestyle that lets citizens walk around with deadly weapons during day-to-day activities.”

“In Hawaii, there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public,” the super-blue state court wrote.

Justice Clarence Thomas explained in a statement joined by Justice Samuel Alito that fixing the state court’s error “must await another day.”

Thomas, Alito, and Neil Gorsuch criticized the Hawaii court’s decision but stated they could not take up the case at this time. They further explained that the defendant, Christopher Wilson, has yet to stand trial on other charges. Wilson was arrested in 2017 for trespassing on private property while carrying an unlicensed pistol.

“Wilson moved to dismiss only some of his charges, most notably leaving for trial a trespassing charge on which his Second Amendment defense has no bearing,” Thomas wrote in a statement joined by Justice Samuel Alito. “He thus seeks review of an interlocutory order over which we may not have jurisdiction.”

Related Posts

Seniors 65+ Just Got a HUGE Tax Surprise From Trump…

President Donald Trump just dropped a tax policy bombshell that has millions of American seniors celebrating. In a new announcement shared directly on social media, Trump confirmed…

Their acne is severe

A person should see a dermatologist if they have cysts, nodules, and deep, painful acne. They have late-onset or persistent acne: Late-onset acne may occur in adults…

HEARTBREAKING NEWS, PRAY FOR JENNIFER ANNISTON

On October 28 2023, the world said goodbye to Matthew Perry, the actor who brought Chandler Bing of Friends to life for ten seasons. His passing has…

You Won’t Believe What King Charles Just Did to Prince Andrew…

In an extraordinary and decisive move that marks a rare disciplinary step within the royal family, King Charles III has announced that his younger brother, Andrew, will…

26 Pictures That Need A Second Look

Our eyes may lie to us more often than we think. Optical illusions are seen in everyday life. Viral Strange will list some pictures that really need…

Don’t look if you can’t handle lt (22 Photos)

A woman’s beauty goes far beyond physical appearance. It’s found in the way she speaks, the kindness in her eyes, the strength in her voice, and the warmth…